GNOME, as a project, has had declining reputation since the move from 2 to 3, which introduced a complete paradigm shift. Only recently has GNOME escalated this willing behaviour to change vital parts of the desktop for some users. Was all of this justified. No. Not at all.
Some extra notes, thoughts, and citations:
-[1] I haven't actually tried Gnome much recently... I only tried it once for this article, and thats about it.
+[1] I haven't actually tried Gnome much recently... I only tried it once for this article, and thats about it.
[2] The HIG is not that bad. At least, not as bad as I make it out to be in some places. While I still personally think it sets a bad precident for any GTK apps, I feel at least some the guidelines makes sense.
[3] I really should stop talking like Luke Smith before I become a neon**i.
[4] https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/qqit79/comment/hk2pawk
diff --git a/blog/source/blog3.md b/blog/source/blog3.md
index 3cc0691..a217be2 100644
--- a/blog/source/blog3.md
+++ b/blog/source/blog3.md
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ GNOME, as a project, has had declining reputation since the move from 2 to 3, wh
Some extra notes, thoughts, and citations:
-\[1] I haven't actually tried Gnome much recently... I only tried it once for this article, and thats about it.
+\[1] I haven't actually tried Gnome much recently... I only tried it once for this article, and thats about it.
\[2] The HIG is not that bad. At least, not as bad as I make it out to be in some places. While I still personally think it sets a bad precident for any GTK apps, I feel at least some the guidelines makes sense.
\[3] I really should stop talking like Luke Smith before I become a neon\*\*i.
\[4] https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/qqit79/comment/hk2pawk