<p>GNOME, as a project, has had declining reputation since the move from 2 to 3, which introduced a complete paradigm shift. Only recently has GNOME escalated this willing behaviour to change vital parts of the desktop for some users. Was all of this justified. No. Not at all. </p>
<p><sub><sup>
Some extra notes, thoughts, and citations:<br/>
[1] I haven't actually tried Gnome much recently... I only tried it once for this article, and thats about it.
[1] I haven't actually tried Gnome much recently... I only tried it once for this article, and thats about it.<br/>
[2] The HIG is not that bad. At least, not as bad as I make it out to be in some places. While I still personally think it sets a bad precident for any GTK apps, I feel at least some the guidelines makes sense.<br/>
[3] I really should stop talking like Luke Smith before I become a neon**i.<br/>
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ GNOME, as a project, has had declining reputation since the move from 2 to 3, wh
<sub><sup>
Some extra notes, thoughts, and citations:
\[1] I haven't actually tried Gnome much recently... I only tried it once for this article, and thats about it.
\[1] I haven't actually tried Gnome much recently... I only tried it once for this article, and thats about it.
\[2] The HIG is not that bad. At least, not as bad as I make it out to be in some places. While I still personally think it sets a bad precident for any GTK apps, I feel at least some the guidelines makes sense.
\[3] I really should stop talking like Luke Smith before I become a neon\*\*i.
